Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

ZWO ASI294MC Pro vs ZWO ASI294MM Pro

ZWO ASI294MC Pro
ZWO

ASI294MC Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

ZWO ASI294MM Pro
ZWO

ASI294MM Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

-75% more resolution
Color vs mono

Specifications

SpecificationZWO ASI294MC ProZWO ASI294MM Pro
Sensor
TypeDedicated CooledDedicated Cooled
SensorSony IMX294Sony IMX492
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format4/3"4/3"
Sensor size19.1×13.0mm19.1×13.0mm
Diagonal23.1mm23.1mm
Pixel size4.63µm4.63µm
Resolution4144×28228288×5644
Megapixels11.7MP46.8MP
ColorYesNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well63700e⁻63700e⁻
Peak QE75%75%
Advantages of ZWO ASI294MC Pro
  • One-shot color — simpler workflow
Advantages of ZWO ASI294MM Pro
  • Higher resolution (46.8MP vs 11.7MP)
  • Mono sensor — ideal for narrowband and LRGB
Best for — ZWO ASI294MC Pro
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — ZWO ASI294MM Pro
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
ZWO ASI294MC Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 4.38° × 2.98°Scale: 3.82"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.93°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.55° × 0.37°Scale: 0.48"/px
ZWO ASI294MM Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 4.38° × 2.98°Scale: 3.82"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.93°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.55° × 0.37°Scale: 0.48"/px
ZWO ASI294MC Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

ZWO ASI294MM Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives