Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

ZWO ASI2400MM Pro vs QHYCCD QHY410C

ZWO ASI2400MM Pro
ZWO

ASI2400MM Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

QHYCCD QHY410C
QHYCCD

QHY410C

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

Key differences

Mono vs color

Specifications

SpecificationZWO ASI2400MM ProQHYCCD QHY410C
Sensor
TypeDedicated Cooleddedicated
SensorSony IMX410Sony IMX410
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatFull FrameFull frame
Sensor size36.0×24.0mm36.0×24.0mm
Diagonal43.3mm43.3mm
Pixel size5.94µm5.94µm
Resolution6072×40426072×4042
Megapixels24.5MP24.5MP
ColorNoYes
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well100000e⁻73000e⁻
Peak QE80%88%
Advantages of ZWO ASI2400MM Pro
  • Mono sensor — ideal for narrowband and LRGB
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY410C
  • One-shot color — simpler workflow
Best for — ZWO ASI2400MM Pro
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — QHYCCD QHY410C
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
ZWO ASI2400MM Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 4.90"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.53"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.61"/px
QHYCCD QHY410C — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 4.90"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.53"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.61"/px
ZWO ASI2400MM Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

QHYCCD QHY410C — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

Recommended alternatives