Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

ZWO ASI178MC vs ZWO ASI385MC

ZWO ASI178MC
ZWO

ASI178MC

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ZWO ASI385MC
ZWO

ASI385MC

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

6% larger sensor
Finer pixels (2.4µm vs 3.75µm)
202% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationZWO ASI178MCZWO ASI385MC
Sensor
Typededicateddedicated
SensorSony IMX178Sony IMX385
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1/1.8"1/2"
Sensor size7.4×4.9mm7.3×4.1mm
Diagonal8.9mm8.4mm
Pixel size2.40µm3.75µm
Resolution3096×20801936×1096
Megapixels6.4MP2.1MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledNoNo
Performance
Full well15000e⁻25000e⁻
Peak QE81%80%
Advantages of ZWO ASI178MC
  • Finer sampling at 2.4µm pixels
  • Higher resolution (6.4MP vs 2.12MP)
Advantages of ZWO ASI385MC
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
Best for — ZWO ASI178MC
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Planetary and lunar high-resolution imaging
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — ZWO ASI385MC
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
ZWO ASI178MC — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 1.70° × 1.12°Scale: 1.98"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.53° × 0.35°Scale: 0.62"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.21° × 0.14°Scale: 0.25"/px
ZWO ASI385MC — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 1.67° × 0.94°Scale: 3.09"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.52° × 0.29°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.21° × 0.12°Scale: 0.39"/px
ZWO ASI178MC — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ZWO ASI385MC — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives