telescopecomparison · 2-way
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II vs William Optics FLT 156
William Optics
Zenithstar 73 II
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
William Optics
FLT 156
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
-60% focal length
-53% aperture
Faster by 1.1 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | William Optics Zenithstar 73 II | William Optics FLT 156 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo doublet FPL-53 | Apo triplet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 73mm | 156mm |
| Focal length | 430mm | 1085mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.9 | f/7.0 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 52mm |
| Full-frame support | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.4kg | 11.5kg |
Advantages of William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
- Wider field — 430mm vs 1085mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/7
- Lighter (2.4kg vs 11.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 156
- Tighter framing — 1085mm vs 430mm focal length
- 114% more light-gathering aperture
- Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — William Optics FLT 156
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
William Optics FLT 156 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.90° × 1.27°Scale: 0.71"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.24° × 0.83°Scale: 0.71"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.60° × 0.60°Scale: 0.71"/px
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
William Optics FLT 156 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.