telescopecomparison · 2-way
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II vs William Optics FLT 132

William Optics
Zenithstar 73 II
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics
FLT 132
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
-54% focal length
-45% aperture
Faster by 1.1 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | William Optics Zenithstar 73 II | William Optics FLT 132 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo doublet FPL-53 | Apo triplet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 73mm | 132mm |
| Focal length | 430mm | 925mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.9 | f/7.0 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 52mm |
| Full-frame support | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.4kg | 7.9kg |
Advantages of William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
- Wider field — 430mm vs 925mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/7
- Lighter (2.4kg vs 7.9kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
- Tighter framing — 925mm vs 430mm focal length
- 81% more light-gathering aperture
- Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.