Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics Zenithstar 73 II vs TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO

William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
William Optics

Zenithstar 73 II

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO
TS-Optics

PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-10% focal length
-9% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics Zenithstar 73 IITS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo doublet FPL-53Apo triplet FPL-53
Aperture73mm80mm
Focal length430mm480mm
Native f/ratiof/5.9f/6.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight2.4kg4.4kg
Advantages of William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
  • Wider field — 430mm vs 480mm focal length
  • Lighter (2.4kg vs 4.4kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO
  • Tighter framing — 480mm vs 430mm focal length
Best for — William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives