Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 91 vs William Optics Zenithstar 61 II

William Optics RedCat 91
William Optics

RedCat 91

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics Zenithstar 61 II
William Optics

Zenithstar 61 II

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+38% focal length
+49% aperture
Faster by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 91William Optics Zenithstar 61 II
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOApo doublet FPL-53
Aperture91mm61mm
Focal length496mm360mm
Native f/ratiof/5.5f/5.9
Image circle45mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight4.3kg1.9kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 91
  • Tighter framing — 496mm vs 360mm focal length
  • 49% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5.45 vs f/5.9
Advantages of William Optics Zenithstar 61 II
  • Wider field — 360mm vs 496mm focal length
  • Lighter (1.9kg vs 4.3kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics RedCat 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Zenithstar 61 II
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics RedCat 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.16° × 2.77°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.71° × 1.81°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.31° × 1.31°Scale: 1.56"/px
William Optics Zenithstar 61 II — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.73° × 3.82°Scale: 2.15"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.74° × 2.50°Scale: 2.15"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.80° × 1.80°Scale: 2.15"/px
William Optics RedCat 91 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics Zenithstar 61 II — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives