telescopecomparison · 2-way
William Optics RedCat 91 vs William Optics GT 102
William Optics
RedCat 91
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
William Optics
GT 102
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
-29% focal length
-11% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | William Optics RedCat 91 | William Optics GT 102 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval APO | Apo triplet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 91mm | 102mm |
| Focal length | 496mm | 703mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.5 | f/6.9 |
| Image circle | 45mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.3kg | 5.6kg |
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 91
- Wider field — 496mm vs 703mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/5.45 vs f/6.9
- Lighter (4.3kg vs 5.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics GT 102
- Tighter framing — 703mm vs 496mm focal length
- 12% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — William Optics RedCat 91
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics GT 102
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 91 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.16° × 2.77°Scale: 1.56"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.71° × 1.81°Scale: 1.56"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.31° × 1.31°Scale: 1.56"/px
William Optics GT 102 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.93° × 1.96°Scale: 1.10"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.92° × 1.28°Scale: 1.10"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.92° × 0.92°Scale: 1.10"/px
William Optics RedCat 91 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
William Optics GT 102 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.