Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 91 vs William Optics FLT 132

William Optics RedCat 91
William Optics

RedCat 91

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 132
William Optics

FLT 132

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-46% focal length
-31% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 91William Optics FLT 132
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture91mm132mm
Focal length496mm925mm
Native f/ratiof/5.5f/7.0
Image circle45mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.3kg7.9kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 91
  • Wider field — 496mm vs 925mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.45 vs f/7
  • Lighter (4.3kg vs 7.9kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
  • Tighter framing — 925mm vs 496mm focal length
  • 45% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — William Optics RedCat 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.16° × 2.77°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.71° × 1.81°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.31° × 1.31°Scale: 1.56"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
William Optics RedCat 91 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives