Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 91 vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED

William Optics RedCat 91
William Optics

RedCat 91

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 80ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+24% focal length
+14% aperture
Slower by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 91Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval APOTriplet APO
Aperture91mm80mm
Focal length496mm400mm
Native f/ratiof/5.5f/5.0
Image circle45mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.3kg5.7kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 91
  • Tighter framing — 496mm vs 400mm focal length
  • 14% more light-gathering aperture
  • Lighter (4.3kg vs 5.7kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 496mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/5.45
Best for — William Optics RedCat 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.16° × 2.77°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.71° × 1.81°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.31° × 1.31°Scale: 1.56"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
William Optics RedCat 91 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives