Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 71 vs William Optics FLT 120

William Optics RedCat 71
William Optics

RedCat 71

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-55% focal length
-41% aperture
Faster by 1.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 71William Optics FLT 120
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval APOTriplet APO
Aperture71mm120mm
Focal length350mm780mm
Native f/ratiof/4.9f/6.5
Image circle45mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight2.7kg7.7kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 71
  • Wider field — 350mm vs 780mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4.9 vs f/6.5
  • Lighter (2.7kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 350mm focal length
  • 69% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — William Optics RedCat 71
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 71 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.89° × 3.93°Scale: 2.22"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.85° × 2.57°Scale: 2.22"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.85° × 1.85°Scale: 2.22"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
William Optics RedCat 71 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives