Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 61 vs William Optics RedCat 91

William Optics RedCat 61
William Optics

RedCat 61

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics RedCat 91
William Optics

RedCat 91

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-40% focal length
-33% aperture
Faster by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 61William Optics RedCat 91
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval APOPetzval APO
Aperture61mm91mm
Focal length300mm496mm
Native f/ratiof/4.9f/5.5
Image circle45mm45mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight2.0kg4.3kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 61
  • Wider field — 300mm vs 496mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4.9 vs f/5.45
  • Lighter (2kg vs 4.3kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 91
  • Tighter framing — 496mm vs 300mm focal length
  • 49% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — William Optics RedCat 61
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics RedCat 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 61 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.88° × 4.58°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.49° × 3.00°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.16° × 2.16°Scale: 2.59"/px
William Optics RedCat 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.16° × 2.77°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.71° × 1.81°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.31° × 1.31°Scale: 1.56"/px
William Optics RedCat 61 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics RedCat 91 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives