Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 61 vs William Optics GT 81

William Optics RedCat 61
William Optics

RedCat 61

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics GT 81
William Optics

GT 81

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-37% focal length
-25% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 61William Optics GT 81
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture61mm81mm
Focal length300mm478mm
Native f/ratiof/4.9f/5.9
Image circle45mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight2.0kg3.8kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 61
  • Wider field — 300mm vs 478mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4.9 vs f/5.9
  • Lighter (2kg vs 3.8kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics GT 81
  • Tighter framing — 478mm vs 300mm focal length
  • 33% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — William Optics RedCat 61
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics GT 81
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 61 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.88° × 4.58°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.49° × 3.00°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.16° × 2.16°Scale: 2.59"/px
William Optics GT 81 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.32° × 2.88°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.82° × 1.88°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
William Optics RedCat 61 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics GT 81 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives