Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 61 vs William Optics FLT 132

William Optics RedCat 61
William Optics

RedCat 61

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 132
William Optics

FLT 132

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-68% focal length
-54% aperture
Faster by 2.1 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 61William Optics FLT 132
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture61mm132mm
Focal length300mm925mm
Native f/ratiof/4.9f/7.0
Image circle45mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight2.0kg7.9kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 61
  • Wider field — 300mm vs 925mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4.9 vs f/7
  • Lighter (2kg vs 7.9kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
  • Tighter framing — 925mm vs 300mm focal length
  • 116% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — William Optics RedCat 61
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 61 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.88° × 4.58°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.49° × 3.00°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.16° × 2.16°Scale: 2.59"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
William Optics RedCat 61 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives