Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 61 vs William Optics FLT 120

William Optics RedCat 61
William Optics

RedCat 61

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-62% focal length
-49% aperture
Faster by 1.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 61William Optics FLT 120
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval APOTriplet APO
Aperture61mm120mm
Focal length300mm780mm
Native f/ratiof/4.9f/6.5
Image circle45mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight2.0kg7.7kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 61
  • Wider field — 300mm vs 780mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4.9 vs f/6.5
  • Lighter (2kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 300mm focal length
  • 97% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — William Optics RedCat 61
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 61 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.88° × 4.58°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.49° × 3.00°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.16° × 2.16°Scale: 2.59"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
William Optics RedCat 61 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives