Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 51 vs William Optics Zenithstar 61 II

William Optics RedCat 51
William Optics

RedCat 51

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics Zenithstar 61 II
William Optics

Zenithstar 61 II

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-31% focal length
-16% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 51William Optics Zenithstar 61 II
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOApo doublet FPL-53
Aperture51mm61mm
Focal length250mm360mm
Native f/ratiof/4.9f/5.9
Image circle45mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight1.6kg1.9kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 51
  • Wider field — 250mm vs 360mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4.9 vs f/5.9
  • Lighter (1.6kg vs 1.9kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics Zenithstar 61 II
  • Tighter framing — 360mm vs 250mm focal length
  • 20% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — William Optics RedCat 51
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Zenithstar 61 II
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics RedCat 51 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.39° × 3.60°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
William Optics Zenithstar 61 II — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.73° × 3.82°Scale: 2.15"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.74° × 2.50°Scale: 2.15"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.80° × 1.80°Scale: 2.15"/px
William Optics RedCat 51 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics Zenithstar 61 II — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives