Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics GT 102 vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED

William Optics GT 102
William Optics

GT 102

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 80ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+76% focal length
+28% aperture
Slower by 1.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics GT 102Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Triplet APO
Aperture102mm80mm
Focal length703mm400mm
Native f/ratiof/6.9f/5.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight5.6kg5.7kg
Advantages of William Optics GT 102
  • Tighter framing — 703mm vs 400mm focal length
  • 28% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 703mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/6.9
Best for — William Optics GT 102
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics GT 102 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.93° × 1.96°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.92° × 1.28°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.92° × 0.92°Scale: 1.10"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
William Optics GT 102 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives