Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics GT 102 vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED

William Optics GT 102
William Optics

GT 102

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 100ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+28% focal length
Slower by 1.4 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics GT 102Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Triplet APO
Aperture102mm100mm
Focal length703mm550mm
Native f/ratiof/6.9f/5.5
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight5.6kg8.6kg
Advantages of William Optics GT 102
  • Tighter framing — 703mm vs 550mm focal length
  • Lighter (5.6kg vs 8.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Wider field — 550mm vs 703mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/6.9
Best for — William Optics GT 102
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics GT 102 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.93° × 1.96°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.92° × 1.28°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.92° × 0.92°Scale: 1.10"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
William Optics GT 102 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives