Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 91 vs William Optics GT 102

William Optics FLT 91
William Optics

FLT 91

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics GT 102
William Optics

GT 102

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-23% focal length
-11% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 91William Optics GT 102
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture91mm102mm
Focal length540mm703mm
Native f/ratiof/5.9f/6.9
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.5kg5.6kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 91
  • Wider field — 540mm vs 703mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/6.9
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 5.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics GT 102
  • Tighter framing — 703mm vs 540mm focal length
  • 12% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — William Optics FLT 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics GT 102
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics FLT 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
William Optics GT 102 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.93° × 1.96°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.92° × 1.28°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.92° × 0.92°Scale: 1.10"/px
William Optics FLT 91 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics GT 102 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives