Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 91 vs William Optics FLT 156

William Optics FLT 91
William Optics

FLT 91

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 156
William Optics

FLT 156

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-50% focal length
-42% aperture
Faster by 1.1 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 91William Optics FLT 156
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture91mm156mm
Focal length540mm1085mm
Native f/ratiof/5.9f/7.0
Image circle44mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.5kg11.5kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 91
  • Wider field — 540mm vs 1085mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/7
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 11.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 156
  • Tighter framing — 1085mm vs 540mm focal length
  • 71% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — William Optics FLT 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 156
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics FLT 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
William Optics FLT 156 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.90° × 1.27°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.24° × 0.83°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.60° × 0.60°Scale: 0.71"/px
William Optics FLT 91 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 156 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives