Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 91 vs William Optics FLT 120

William Optics FLT 91
William Optics

FLT 91

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-31% focal length
-24% aperture
Faster by 0.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 91William Optics FLT 120
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designTriplet APOTriplet APO
Aperture91mm120mm
Focal length540mm780mm
Native f/ratiof/5.9f/6.5
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.5kg7.7kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 91
  • Wider field — 540mm vs 780mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/6.5
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 540mm focal length
  • 32% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — William Optics FLT 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics FLT 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
William Optics FLT 91 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives