telescopecomparison · 2-way
William Optics FLT 91 vs Tele Vue TV-76
William Optics
FLT 91
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+13% focal length
+20% aperture
Faster by 0.4 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | William Optics FLT 91 | Tele Vue TV-76 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Triplet APO | Apo doublet |
| Aperture | 91mm | 76mm |
| Focal length | 540mm | 480mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.9 | f/6.3 |
| Image circle | 44mm | — |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.5kg | 2.3kg |
Advantages of William Optics FLT 91
- Tighter framing — 540mm vs 480mm focal length
- 20% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/6.3
- Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Tele Vue TV-76
- Wider field — 480mm vs 540mm focal length
- Lighter (2.3kg vs 4.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 91
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue TV-76
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics FLT 91 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
Tele Vue TV-76 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
William Optics FLT 91 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Tele Vue TV-76 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.