Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 91 vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED

William Optics FLT 91
William Optics

FLT 91

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 80ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+35% focal length
+14% aperture
Slower by 0.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 91Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designTriplet APOTriplet APO
Aperture91mm80mm
Focal length540mm400mm
Native f/ratiof/5.9f/5.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.5kg5.7kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 91
  • Tighter framing — 540mm vs 400mm focal length
  • 14% more light-gathering aperture
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 5.7kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 540mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/5.9
Best for — William Optics FLT 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics FLT 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
William Optics FLT 91 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives