Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 156 vs Takahashi TOA-130NFB

William Optics FLT 156
William Optics

FLT 156

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB
Takahashi

TOA-130NFB

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+9% focal length
+20% aperture
Faster by 0.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 156Takahashi TOA-130NFB
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Apo triplet
Aperture156mm130mm
Focal length1085mm1000mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/7.7
Image circle52mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight11.5kg9.6kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 156
  • 20% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.7
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (9.6kg vs 11.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 156
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics FLT 156 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.90° × 1.27°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.24° × 0.83°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.60° × 0.60°Scale: 0.71"/px
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
William Optics FLT 156 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives