telescopecomparison · 2-way
William Optics FLT 132 vs Tele Vue TV-76
William Optics
FLT 132
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
+93% focal length
+74% aperture
Slower by 0.7 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | William Optics FLT 132 | Tele Vue TV-76 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo triplet FPL-53 | Apo doublet |
| Aperture | 132mm | 76mm |
| Focal length | 925mm | 480mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.0 | f/6.3 |
| Image circle | 52mm | — |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 7.9kg | 2.3kg |
Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
- Tighter framing — 925mm vs 480mm focal length
- 74% more light-gathering aperture
- Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Tele Vue TV-76
- Wider field — 480mm vs 925mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/6.3 vs f/7
- Lighter (2.3kg vs 7.9kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue TV-76
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
Tele Vue TV-76 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Tele Vue TV-76 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.