Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 132 vs Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED

William Optics FLT 132
William Optics

FLT 132

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
Sky-Watcher

Evolux 62ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+157% focal length
+113% aperture
Slower by 1.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 132Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Apo doublet FPL-53
Aperture132mm62mm
Focal length925mm360mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.8
Image circle52mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.9kg2.2kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
  • Tighter framing — 925mm vs 360mm focal length
  • 113% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
  • Wider field — 360mm vs 925mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.8 vs f/7
  • Lighter (2.2kg vs 7.9kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.73° × 3.82°Scale: 2.15"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.74° × 2.50°Scale: 2.15"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.80° × 1.80°Scale: 2.15"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives