Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 132 vs Askar SQA106

William Optics FLT 132
William Optics

FLT 132

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar SQA106
Askar

SQA106

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+59% focal length
+25% aperture
Slower by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 132Askar SQA106
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Quadruplet astrograph FPL-51
Aperture132mm106mm
Focal length925mm580mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.5
Image circle52mm60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.9kg6.5kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
  • Tighter framing — 925mm vs 580mm focal length
  • 25% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Askar SQA106
  • Wider field — 580mm vs 925mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (6.5kg vs 7.9kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar SQA106
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
Askar SQA106 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.56° × 2.37°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.32° × 1.55°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 1.12°Scale: 1.34"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar SQA106 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives