Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 120 vs William Optics Zenithstar 73 II

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
William Optics

Zenithstar 73 II

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+81% focal length
+64% aperture
Slower by 0.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 120William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo doublet FPL-53
Aperture120mm73mm
Focal length780mm430mm
Native f/ratiof/6.5f/5.9
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.7kg2.4kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 430mm focal length
  • 64% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
  • Wider field — 430mm vs 780mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/6.5
  • Lighter (2.4kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Zenithstar 73 II
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
William Optics Zenithstar 73 II — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Zenithstar 73 II — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives