Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 120 vs William Optics GT 102

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics GT 102
William Optics

GT 102

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+11% focal length
+18% aperture
Faster by 0.4 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 120William Optics GT 102
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture120mm102mm
Focal length780mm703mm
Native f/ratiof/6.5f/6.9
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.7kg5.6kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 703mm focal length
  • 18% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/6.5 vs f/6.9
Advantages of William Optics GT 102
  • Lighter (5.6kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics GT 102
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
William Optics GT 102 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.93° × 1.96°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.92° × 1.28°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.92° × 0.92°Scale: 1.10"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics GT 102 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives