Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Vixen SD115S vs Vixen R200SS

Vixen SD115S
Vixen

SD115S

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Vixen R200SS
Vixen

R200SS

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+11% focal length
-42% aperture
Slower by 3.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationVixen SD115SVixen R200SS
Optics
Typerefractornewtonian
Optical designApo doublet SDNewtonian astrograph
Aperture115mm200mm
Focal length890mm800mm
Native f/ratiof/7.7f/4.0
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight4.8kg7.5kg
Advantages of Vixen SD115S
  • Tighter framing — 890mm vs 800mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (4.8kg vs 7.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Vixen R200SS
  • Wider field — 800mm vs 890mm focal length
  • 74% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7.7
Best for — Vixen SD115S
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Vixen R200SS
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Vixen SD115S — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.32° × 1.55°Scale: 0.87"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.51° × 1.01°Scale: 0.87"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.73° × 0.73°Scale: 0.87"/px
Vixen R200SS — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Vixen SD115S — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Vixen R200SS — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives