telescopecomparison · 2-way
Vaonis Stellina vs Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
Vaonis
Stellina
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.
Sky-Watcher
Evolux 62ED
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+11% focal length
+29% aperture
Faster by 0.8 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Vaonis Stellina | Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | smart-telescope | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo doublet all-in-one | Apo doublet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 80mm | 62mm |
| Focal length | 400mm | 360mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.0 | f/5.8 |
| Image circle | — | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 11.2kg | 2.2kg |
Advantages of Vaonis Stellina
- Tighter framing — 400mm vs 360mm focal length
- 29% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/5 vs f/5.8
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
- Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
- Lighter (2.2kg vs 11.2kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Vaonis Stellina
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Vaonis Stellina — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 5.73° × 3.82°Scale: 2.15"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.74° × 2.50°Scale: 2.15"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.80° × 1.80°Scale: 2.15"/px
Vaonis Stellina — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.