Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Unistellar eVscope 2 vs Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4

Unistellar eVscope 2
Unistellar

eVscope 2

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-15% focal length
+8% aperture
Faster by 1.1 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationUnistellar eVscope 2Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Optics
Typesmart-telescopeRefractor
Optical designNewtonian all-in-onePetzval APO
Aperture114mm106mm
Focal length450mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/3.9f/5.0
Image circle88mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight9.0kg7.5kg
Advantages of Unistellar eVscope 2
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 530mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/5
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Tighter framing — 530mm vs 450mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 9kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Unistellar eVscope 2
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Unistellar eVscope 2 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Unistellar eVscope 2 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives