Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Unistellar Equinox 2 vs William Optics Zenithstar 81 II

Unistellar Equinox 2
Unistellar

Equinox 2

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Zenithstar 81 II
William Optics

Zenithstar 81 II

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-6% focal length
+41% aperture
Faster by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationUnistellar Equinox 2William Optics Zenithstar 81 II
Optics
Typesmart-telescoperefractor
Optical designNewtonian all-in-oneApo doublet FPL-53
Aperture114mm81mm
Focal length450mm478mm
Native f/ratiof/3.9f/5.9
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight9.0kg3.6kg
Advantages of Unistellar Equinox 2
  • 41% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/5.9
Advantages of William Optics Zenithstar 81 II
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (3.6kg vs 9kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Unistellar Equinox 2
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — William Optics Zenithstar 81 II
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Unistellar Equinox 2 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
William Optics Zenithstar 81 II — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.32° × 2.88°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.82° × 1.88°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
Unistellar Equinox 2 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Zenithstar 81 II — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives