telescopecomparison · 2-way
Unistellar Equinox 2 vs Takahashi Epsilon-130D
Unistellar
Equinox 2
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.
Takahashi
Epsilon-130D
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
-12% aperture
Slower by 0.6 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Unistellar Equinox 2 | Takahashi Epsilon-130D |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | smart-telescope | astrograph |
| Optical design | Newtonian all-in-one | Hyperbolic Newtonian |
| Aperture | 114mm | 130mm |
| Focal length | 450mm | 430mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/3.9 | f/3.3 |
| Image circle | — | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 9.0kg | 7.8kg |
Advantages of Unistellar Equinox 2
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-130D
- 14% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/3.9
- Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Unistellar Equinox 2
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-130D
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Unistellar Equinox 2 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-130D — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
Unistellar Equinox 2 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.
Takahashi Epsilon-130D — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.