Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Tele Vue NP127fli vs Astro-Tech AT115EDT

Tele Vue NP127fli
Tele Vue

NP127fli

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT
Astro-Tech

AT115EDT

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-18% focal length
+10% aperture
Faster by 1.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTele Vue NP127fliAstro-Tech AT115EDT
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designNagler-PetzvalApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture127mm115mm
Focal length660mm805mm
Native f/ratiof/5.2f/7.0
Image circle52mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.5kg6.6kg
Advantages of Tele Vue NP127fli
  • Wider field — 660mm vs 805mm focal length
  • 10% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5.2 vs f/7
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Tighter framing — 805mm vs 660mm focal length
  • Lighter (6.6kg vs 9.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Tele Vue NP127fli
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Tele Vue NP127fli — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.08°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.04° × 1.36°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.98° × 0.98°Scale: 1.18"/px
Astro-Tech AT115EDT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.56° × 1.71°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.67° × 1.12°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.80°Scale: 0.96"/px
Tele Vue NP127fli — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives