Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi TSA-120 vs Unistellar Equinox 2

Takahashi TSA-120
Takahashi

TSA-120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Unistellar Equinox 2
Unistellar

Equinox 2

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+100% focal length
+5% aperture
Slower by 3.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi TSA-120Unistellar Equinox 2
Optics
TypeRefractorsmart-telescope
Optical designTriplet APONewtonian all-in-one
Aperture120mm114mm
Focal length900mm450mm
Native f/ratiof/7.5f/3.9
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.5kg9.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi TSA-120
  • Tighter framing — 900mm vs 450mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 9kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Unistellar Equinox 2
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 900mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/7.5
Best for — Takahashi TSA-120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Unistellar Equinox 2
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Takahashi TSA-120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Unistellar Equinox 2 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi TSA-120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Unistellar Equinox 2 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives