Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi TOA-130NFB vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED

Takahashi TOA-130NFB
Takahashi

TOA-130NFB

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 150ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-13% aperture
Slower by 0.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi TOA-130NFBSky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo tripletTriplet APO
Aperture130mm150mm
Focal length1000mm1050mm
Native f/ratiof/7.7f/7.0
Image circle88mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.6kg17.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (9.6kg vs 17kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • 15% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.7
Best for — Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.96° × 1.31°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.86°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.62° × 0.62°Scale: 0.74"/px
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives