Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Mewlon-210 vs Tele Vue NP101is

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Tele Vue NP101is
Tele Vue

NP101is

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+347% focal length
+108% aperture
Slower by 6.1 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Mewlon-210Tele Vue NP101is
Optics
TypecassegrainRefractor
Optical designDall-KirkhamPetzval
Aperture210mm101mm
Focal length2415mm540mm
Native f/ratiof/11.5f/5.4
Image circle40mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg4.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Tighter framing — 2415mm vs 540mm focal length
  • 108% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Tele Vue NP101is
  • Wider field — 540mm vs 2415mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.4 vs f/11.5
  • Larger image circle (40mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Tele Vue NP101is
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Tele Vue NP101is — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Tele Vue NP101is — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives