Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Mewlon-210 vs Stellarvue SVX152T

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Stellarvue SVX152T
Stellarvue

SVX152T

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+101% focal length
+38% aperture
Slower by 3.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Mewlon-210Stellarvue SVX152T
Optics
Typecassegrainrefractor
Optical designDall-KirkhamApo triplet
Aperture210mm152mm
Focal length2415mm1200mm
Native f/ratiof/11.5f/7.9
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg14.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Tighter framing — 2415mm vs 1200mm focal length
  • 38% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX152T
  • Wider field — 1200mm vs 2415mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/7.9 vs f/11.5
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Stellarvue SVX152T
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Stellarvue SVX152T — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.72° × 1.15°Scale: 0.65"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 0.75°Scale: 0.65"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.54° × 0.54°Scale: 0.65"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Stellarvue SVX152T — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives