Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Mewlon-210 vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 150P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+303% focal length
+40% aperture
Slower by 7.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Mewlon-210Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Optics
Typecassegrainnewtonian
Optical designDall-KirkhamNewtonian astrograph
Aperture210mm150mm
Focal length2415mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/11.5f/4.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight15.5kg7.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Tighter framing — 2415mm vs 600mm focal length
  • 40% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Wider field — 600mm vs 2415mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/11.5
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives