Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Mewlon-210 vs Askar 151PHQ

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Askar 151PHQ
Askar

151PHQ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+128% focal length
+39% aperture
Slower by 4.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Mewlon-210Askar 151PHQ
Optics
Typecassegrainrefractor
Optical designDall-KirkhamPetzval quintuplet FPL-51
Aperture210mm151mm
Focal length2415mm1057mm
Native f/ratiof/11.5f/7.0
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg15.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Tighter framing — 2415mm vs 1057mm focal length
  • 39% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Askar 151PHQ
  • Wider field — 1057mm vs 2415mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/11.5
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Askar 151PHQ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Askar 151PHQ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.95° × 1.30°Scale: 0.73"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.27° × 0.85°Scale: 0.73"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.61° × 0.61°Scale: 0.73"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Askar 151PHQ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives