Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX vs Takahashi TOA-150B

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Takahashi

FSQ-85EDX

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi TOA-150B
Takahashi

TOA-150B

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-59% focal length
-43% aperture
Faster by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-85EDXTakahashi TOA-150B
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOApo triplet
Aperture85mm150mm
Focal length450mm1100mm
Native f/ratiof/5.3f/7.3
Image circle44mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.0kg13.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 1100mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.3 vs f/7.3
  • Lighter (4kg vs 13.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-150B
  • Tighter framing — 1100mm vs 450mm focal length
  • 76% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TOA-150B
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi TOA-150B — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.88° × 1.25°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 0.82°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.59° × 0.59°Scale: 0.71"/px
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi TOA-150B — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives