Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX vs Takahashi TOA-130NFB

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Takahashi

FSQ-85EDX

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB
Takahashi

TOA-130NFB

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-55% focal length
-35% aperture
Faster by 2.4 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-85EDXTakahashi TOA-130NFB
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOApo triplet
Aperture85mm130mm
Focal length450mm1000mm
Native f/ratiof/5.3f/7.7
Image circle44mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.0kg9.6kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.3 vs f/7.7
  • Lighter (4kg vs 9.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 450mm focal length
  • 53% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives