Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX vs Takahashi Mewlon-210

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Takahashi

FSQ-85EDX

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-81% focal length
-60% aperture
Faster by 6.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-85EDXTakahashi Mewlon-210
Optics
TypeRefractorcassegrain
Optical designPetzval APODall-Kirkham
Aperture85mm210mm
Focal length450mm2415mm
Native f/ratiof/5.3f/11.5
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight4.0kg15.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 2415mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.3 vs f/11.5
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (4kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Tighter framing — 2415mm vs 450mm focal length
  • 147% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives