Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX vs Takahashi Epsilon-180ED

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Takahashi

FSQ-85EDX

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-180ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-10% focal length
-53% aperture
Slower by 2.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-85EDXTakahashi Epsilon-180ED
Optics
TypeRefractorastrograph
Optical designPetzval APOHyperbolic Newtonian
Aperture85mm180mm
Focal length450mm500mm
Native f/ratiof/5.3f/2.8
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.0kg12.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Lighter (4kg vs 12.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
  • Tighter framing — 500mm vs 450mm focal length
  • 112% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.8 vs f/5.3
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-180ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Epsilon-180ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives