Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX vs Takahashi Epsilon-160ED

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Takahashi

FSQ-85EDX

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-15% focal length
-47% aperture
Slower by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-85EDXTakahashi Epsilon-160ED
Optics
TypeRefractorNewtonian
Optical designPetzval APOHyperbolic astrograph
Aperture85mm160mm
Focal length450mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/5.3f/3.3
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.0kg10.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 530mm focal length
  • Lighter (4kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Tighter framing — 530mm vs 450mm focal length
  • 88% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/5.3
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives