telescopecomparison · 2-way
Takahashi FSQ-130ED vs Stellarvue SVX130T
Takahashi
FSQ-130ED
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Stellarvue
SVX130T
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
-29% focal length
Faster by 2.0 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Takahashi FSQ-130ED | Stellarvue SVX130T |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | Refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval quadruplet | Triplet APO |
| Aperture | 130mm | 130mm |
| Focal length | 650mm | 910mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.0 | f/7.0 |
| Image circle | 88mm | 60mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 11.0kg | 10.0kg |
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-130ED
- Wider field — 650mm vs 910mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/5 vs f/7
- Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX130T
- Tighter framing — 910mm vs 650mm focal length
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-130ED
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Stellarvue SVX130T
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.17° × 2.12°Scale: 1.19"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 1.19"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.19"/px
Stellarvue SVX130T — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.27° × 1.51°Scale: 0.85"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.48° × 0.99°Scale: 0.85"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.71° × 0.71°Scale: 0.85"/px
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Stellarvue SVX130T — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.