Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 vs Takahashi TSA-120

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TSA-120
Takahashi

TSA-120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-41% focal length
-12% aperture
Faster by 2.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4Takahashi TSA-120
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval APOTriplet APO
Aperture106mm120mm
Focal length530mm900mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/7.5
Image circle88mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.5kg7.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 900mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/7.5
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Takahashi TSA-120
  • Tighter framing — 900mm vs 530mm focal length
  • 13% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TSA-120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi TSA-120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TSA-120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives