Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 vs Takahashi TOA-150B

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TOA-150B
Takahashi

TOA-150B

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-52% focal length
-29% aperture
Faster by 2.3 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4Takahashi TOA-150B
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOApo triplet
Aperture106mm150mm
Focal length530mm1100mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/7.3
Image circle88mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.5kg13.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 1100mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/7.3
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 13.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-150B
  • Tighter framing — 1100mm vs 530mm focal length
  • 42% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TOA-150B
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi TOA-150B — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.88° × 1.25°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 0.82°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.59° × 0.59°Scale: 0.71"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TOA-150B — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives