Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 vs Takahashi FSQ-130ED

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-130ED
Takahashi

FSQ-130ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-18% focal length
-18% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4Takahashi FSQ-130ED
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOPetzval quadruplet
Aperture106mm130mm
Focal length530mm650mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/5.0
Image circle88mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.5kg11.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 650mm focal length
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 11kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Tighter framing — 650mm vs 530mm focal length
  • 23% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.17° × 2.12°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.19"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-130ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives